Gwyneth Paltrow not liable in Utah ski collision, jury says – Nationwide

Gwyneth Paltrow received her court docket battle over a 2016 ski collision at a complicated Utah ski resort after a jury determined Thursday that the film star wasn’t at fault for the crash.

A jury dismissed the grievance of a retired optometrist who sued Paltrow over accidents he sustained when the 2 crashed on a newbie run at Deer Valley ski resort, siding with Paltrow after eight days of live-streamed courtroom testimony that made the case a popular culture fixation.

Paltrow, an actor who lately has refashioned herself into a star wellness entrepreneur, appeared to her attorneys with a pursed lips smile when the choose learn the eight-member jury’s verdict within the Park Metropolis courtroom. She sat intently by two weeks of testimony in what turned the largest celeb court docket case since actors Johnny Depp and Amber Heard confronted off final 12 months.

The dismissal concludes two weeks of courtroom proceedings that hinged largely on popularity relatively than the financial damages at stake within the case. Paltrow’s attorneys described the grievance in opposition to her as “utter B.S.” and painted the Goop founder-CEO as uniquely susceptible to unfair, frivolous lawsuits as a result of her celeb.

Paltrow took the witness stand in the course of the trial to insist the collision wasn’t her fault, and to explain how she was surprised when she felt “a physique urgent in opposition to me and a really unusual grunting noise.”

4:50
‘I didn’t trigger the accident’: Gwyneth Paltrow testifies in ski collision trial

All through the trial, the phrase “uphill” turned synonymous with “responsible, ” as attorneys targeted on a largely unknown snowboarding code of conduct that stipulates that the skier who’s downhill or forward on the slope has the best of means.

Worldwide audiences adopted the celeb trial as if it have been episodic tv. Viewers scrutinized each Paltrow and Sanderson’s motives whereas attorneys directed inquiries to witnesses that always had much less to do with the collision and extra to do with their consumer’s reputations.

The trial occurred in Park Metropolis, a resort city recognized for internet hosting the annual Sundance Movie Competition, the place early in her profession Paltrow would seem for the premieres of her films together with 1998’s “Sliding Doorways,” at a time when she was recognized primarily as an actor, not a way of life influencer. Paltrow can also be recognized for her roles in “Shakespeare in Love,” which received her an Academy Award, and the “Iron Man” films.

2:22
Gwyneth Paltrow ski crash trial: Terry Sanderson testifies he was hit within the again by skier, went ‘flying’

The jury’s determination marks a painful court docket defeat for Terry Sanderson, the person who sued Paltrow for greater than $300,000 over accidents he sustained once they crashed on a newbie run. Each events blamed the opposite for the collision. Sanderson, 76, broke 4 ribs and sustained a concussion after the 2 tumbled down the slope, with Paltrow touchdown on high of him.

He filed an amended grievance after an earlier $3.1 million lawsuit was dismissed. Paltrow in response countersued for $1 and legal professional charges, a symbolic motion that mirrors Taylor Swift’s response to a radio host’s defamation lawsuit. Swift was awarded $1 in 2017.

Paltrow’s protection crew tried to color Sanderson as an indignant, ageing and unsympathetic man who had through the years turn into “obsessed” together with his lawsuit in opposition to Paltrow. They argued that Paltrow wasn’t at fault within the crash and in addition mentioned, no matter blame, that Sanderson was overstating the extent of his accidents.

AP author Anna Furman contributed from Los Angeles.

&copy 2023 The Canadian Press